← Places & the world Places & the world · Challenging English

Uniform Law to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Within or Without a State in Criminal Proceedings

Uniform law in the United States

2 min
estimated reading
4
complete sections
12.16
algorithmic grade estimate

Before you read

Use the article and the local dictionary together

The complexity label is calculated from sentence length and syllable estimates; it is guidance, not an assessment of you. Open any highlighted word below for its full local dictionary page.

Words
349
Native text
2869 characters
Dictionary match
85%
Revision
1358153034 · 2026-06-06T22:49:16Z
Key vocabulary

Words to check before reading

Overview

The Uniform Law to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Within or Without a State in Criminal Proceedings, also known as the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings, is a uniform law within the United States. It provides a process by which an attorney in a criminal matter in one U.S. state may seek to secure the attendance of a witness (or seek documents from a witness) from another state; the process requires the approval of courts in both the state in which the criminal matter is being heard, as well as a court in the state in which the witness is found. In the absence of the process being followed, the subpoena power of any state court in the United States generally ends at that state’s border. The uniform law was drafted in 1931, and revised in 1936. In 1959, the U.S.

Supreme Court sustained the Act in an opinion in New York v. O'Neill written by Justice Felix Frankfurter. By 2012, it had been adopted by all states in the United States.

History

The subpoena power of any state court in the United States generally ends at that state’s border. Consequently, lacking any powers outside the state's border, state prosecutors and defense attorneys in a state criminal case cannot use the same procedures that they would use to obtain a subpoena for an out-of-state witness that they would for an in-state witness. The Uniform Law to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Within or Without a State in Criminal Proceedings was drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. It was drafted by the Conference at its 46th annual meeting in September 1931 in Atlantic City, New Jersey, in cooperation with the American Law Institute. It was revised in August 1936 in Boston, Massachusetts, in cooperation with the Interstate Commission on Crime, which also approved it that month.

The American Bar Association approved it in September 1931, and re-approved it in August 1936. By 1959, 42 state legislatures and the Puerto Rico legislature had adopted it. By 2012, all states in the United States had adopted the Uniform Law, starting with North Dakota in 1931 and ending with Alabama in 1977.

Provisions

The law includes provisions for seeking attendance of out-of-state witnesses at criminal proceedings (or submission of documents) in the originating state's courts on a showing of materiality, necessity, and the absence of any contravening public policy. Obtaining a subpoena under the Uniform Act requires the filing of a timely motion asking a court in State A (where the trial will take place) to issue a certificate order that formally asks a court in State B to summon a witness to appear in State A or to provide documents in State A (a subpoena duces tecum). The burden of proof at the materiality hearing is on the party requesting the subpoena.

See also

*List of uniform acts (United States)

Places & the world

Continue with related local reading

Open learning series

Continue with a related English lesson